Eadweard Muybridge was an English photographer who spent much of his life in the USA.
He is known for his pioneering work on animal location which he used multiple cameras to capture motion, and his
'zoopraxiscope' a device for projecting motion pictures.
Muybridge enjoyed taking photographs of nature and landscapes and was famously known for these photographs. In 1872, he was involved in a popular-debate which helped answer a Governors' question : whether all four of a horses hooves are off the ground at the same time during the trot.
Up until this time most paintings of horses are made with the front legs extended forwards and the hind legs extended back. Stanford wanted to prove this and asked Muybridge to help him do this.
To do this, Muybridge used a series of large cameras that used glass plates placed in a line, each one being triggered by a thread as the horses passed. Later on, a clock work device was used and the images were copied in the form of silhouettes onto a disc and viewed in the machine
Zoopraxiscope. Muybridge helped answer Stanfords question and actually ended up producing a photograph of a horse in fast motion.
The equipment Muybridge used was large cameras, glass plates and the images were viewed with a Zoopraxiscope.
Muybridge edited his pictures of horses and developed them as Silhouettes. He also was a very good image manipulator and edited his images by cutting and pasting and putting different negatives in it. This was over 100 years before Photoshop was made.
In this image, you can see the horse in each of the movements that the cameras captured. The main subject of the image are the horses as they are in the middle of each box and it is in black and white so you can see the silhouette of the horse clearly. The images are all the same so you have to look at each image closely to see the difference.
Muybridges photographs are similar to mine because we both capture things that are happening in the moment and we have a theme that runs through our photographs.
However, they are different because Muybridge did a lot of motion films to present his photographs and developed them as silhouettes. Also, all of Muybridges photographs are in black and white due to being silhouettes whereas ours as developed in colour. My images are of the same subject but not all of the same thing so they are not that repetitive.
Duane Michals
Michals focused a lot of his images on portraiture but because he didn't have a studio and he didn't learn a lot about photography in the studio etc (he mostly taught himself), he went outside into the real world and based his portraiture on people outside in their own environment. The images are quite interesting as the top photograph is set out in a sequence and it looks as if the images relate to the time it was taken as each person slowly moves in each photograph. I look at each photograph as if it was telling a story.
This photograph is quite interesting as it is the same person but is a reflection of his throughout. I don't know how this is done but its quite dramatic as it is in black and white. The subject is the man in the photograph. This is a nice portraiture photograph because the person hasn't got any expression on his face.
From looking at Michals photographs, I can see that he enjoys taking portraiture photographs with a strange twist to it. Such as, he likes involving mirrors to get a reflection out of the photograph which means that the viewer can see each aspect of the person involved.
This photograph shows that Michals bases most of his photographs on sequences of events. This shows that he went out and pictured people during there normal life and made impressive tonal photographs about this. Even though the pictures are in a sequence each scene changes and who is in it.
His images are similar to my own because he bases his photographs on portraiture and landscapes. They also aren't planned which are similar to our own because when we go out to shoot we go out to see what we can find with a rough idea in our head of what we are going to photograph where as other photographers know what they are going to do exactly. Our photographs are slightly random which makes each photograph unique.